Friday, 19 May 2023

Myth, Religion and Rituals

 Myth, Religion and Rituals

Dr. Swati Joshi 

This is very notion that Myth is related to religion but science and philosophy have given challenge to religion on the authenticity of myth. Myth when seen in relation with religion then they are in the category of traditional myth as biblical and classical myth but as the time continues these myths are read on the basis of symbol and not taken mythically or legendary. Sometime myth is not lock up to clearly religious ancient stories. The term “Demythologized’ came in the world of myth which is about human experience; an expression of what it ‘feels’ in the world that kills a religious purpose of myth and give a scientific approach to myth. When science interprets myth then it became symbolic only and out of touch of religion. The work religious or religion in myth is related to rituals. There are rituals that symbolize religious touch to any myth. William Robertson Smith a Scottish Biblicist (expert on the bible) in his lecture on ‘the Religion of the Semites’ (a member of any of various ancient and modern people originating in southwestern Asia including Hebrews) disputed that the central object of modern religion is belief but this is not applicable for the ancient religion because the central object of ancient religion are rituals. Smith discussed that ancients executed rituals because they have their own reason which are irrelevant and can change. The reason behind fluctuation was story or myth. The stories and myths are to explain the condition according to the chronological order that means the first come first theory and established the events as command by God. In this matter Myth come on second position and rituals are compulsory and myth become elective. Myth and rituals are interrelated but these two have shifting positions. But both are having identical significance.  Smith stated that for him myth cannot be seen without rituals. According to E.B.Tylor -Myth is nothing but clarification of the substantial world and myth is not related with social like rituals. But one term is common between Smith and Tylor that myth is completely ancient.  In modern religion is not including myth and rituals. It can be said that myth and religion are not only ancient but also primitive. 

Dr. Swati Joshi 

Myths and Philosophy

 Myths and Philosophy

Dr. Swati Joshi 

Myth can be seen through religion, science and even with philosophy. The book ‘Primitive Man as Philosopher’ written by Paul Radin will give glimpse about the relation of Myth and Philosophy. According to Radin myth is full of primitive assumptions, having place in the world. Radin considered that myth compact with all kind of metaphysical area which stands against the world of reality. Ernst Cassirer the German Philosopher discussed about myth that myth works in the structure of knowledge and that knowledge may be language, art or science. The French existentialist Albert Camus discussed about the decreasing factor of myth to philosophy in Greek myth of Sisyphus. The genuine function of Myth is not to show the objective representation of world 

Dr. Swati Joshi 

Thursday, 18 May 2023

Myth and Science- Dr. Swati Joshi

 Myth and Science-  Dr. Swati Joshi 

In 19th century the theories on myth focuses chiefly on the origin of myth but in the 20th century theories were focused on the composition (subject matter) and (function) utility of myths. But this concept has given birth to mystification between past origin and repeated origin. This concept has given birth to where and when the myth first occurs and how myth takes place? Sometime general questions are asked that myth can be called universal? Or myth is true or not?  Theories are incomplete without myth and myth is not complete without theory. With this statement we can see myth and science. The main challenges to myth have come not from ethical point of view but from science view points. But it should be very clear that science means “modern science” which is not related to mythic or religious science. Myth and science come together with assurance that myth is believable because it is scientific. But this concept works against the term “demythologizing” - a disconnection of myth from science.  To prove this statement we have example of the first plague in that the water of Nile turns into blood (Exodus- 7:14-24) but the editor of the New Oxford Annotated Bible has seen this incident from the scientific point of view and declare that – The epidemic of blood was a usual occurrence of Egypt and the red blood color of the water of Nile was at its pinnacle in the season of summer because of the red element of earth or may be because of microscopic life form. This was the scientific approach to myth of Egypt. On the second plague that is related with Frog (Exodus 8:1-15)  the editor has given different scientific reason that the frog was produced in the mud of the Nile  because of the recurring teeming and that was the natural atmosphere for Frog to produced. We have these two incidents of myth where people are saying that because of the curse of God these incidents happened there.  The above incident discussed that one should not considered myth against science but one has to see myth into science. It does not mean that science is noted into myth. Other aspects can be seen from scientific view point which is discussed already. After the discussion next question arises that can myth be as Primitive Science? Myth is a part of religion and religion itself is a science. Myth sometime becomes the casualty of the procedure of secularization that comprises modernity. But E. B. Tylor presented his view that Myth and Science are at chances and he considered myth under religion and religion and science works under philosophy. He separated philosophy into two category ‘primitive’ and ‘modern’.  Primitive philosophy is a religion but science is not primitive. Comparatively Modern Philosophy has two division religion and science. Modern religion has two divisions – metaphysics and ethics but none represents primitive religion.   J.C. Frazer Scottish anthropologist was of the opinion that myth is based on   religion and religion is the complement to natural science. The primitive opinion of Frazer and Tylor is rational. F.M Conford is of the opinion that Myth and religion has given birth to Greek science but he gave importance to content only. 

“Science tries to document the factual character of the natural world, and to develop theories that coordinate and explain these facts. Religion, on the other hand, operates in the equally important, but utterly different, realm of human purpose, meanings, and values.”12 

The French Philosopher and anthropologist Lucien Le’vy- Bruhl is of another opinion on Myth. Lucien considered Myth on a broad way and separated myth and science and discussed that primitive thinking has no rationale attitude. Lucien strongly uttered that Primitive thinking is not related to philosophy and primitives had their own ideas, and concept that turn into myth. Bronislaw Malinowski is against the concept of Lucien. Malinowski discussed that Science is used by primitives to manage the substantial world in that science converted into magic. This magic discontinues and then primitives spin to myth.  Clause Levi- Strauss – the French structural anthropologist talked deeply about primitive, science and myth. According to Strauss,

“Myth is outright scientific because it goes beyond the recording of observed contradictions to the tempering of them. Those contradictions are to be found not in the plot or myth but in structure.”13 

Karl Popper who was philosopher of science has his own views on myth which is against Tylor. 

Popper considered that

“Science emerges out of myth’: most of our scientific theories originate in myth. He discussed that ‘Science originates not out of the acceptance of myth but out of the criticism of it. By criticism …… not rejection but assessment which becomes scientific when it takes the form of subjection to attempt to falsify the truth claims made.”14 

Dr Swati Joshi

Gujarat 

Myth - Dr. Swati Joshi

 Myth

Dr. Swati Joshi

Gujarat 

‘Myth’ – we consider that we know this term and also know “what is myth?’’ But when we have to delineate the word more specifically then difficulties are ahead and asking for precise respond. “Myth” itself is a complicated and wide-ranging term to provide any fussy definition. In modern English ‘Myth’ is developed for huge amount of dissimilar stories from our intimates to the contemporary epics that is based on predictable world. Myth the word generated from the Greek word “muthos” Homer used the word and give the meaning as sequence of events and discussions but not related with fiction. Another term is “muthologenevein” means “telling a story” used by Odysseus. Now a day the term Myth means a fiction, deals with psychological facts. But the term cannot be defined without established past vision and new changed fantasies. To be extremely clear on area under discussion one should initially think about “established” definitions of myth. 

Myth has various definitions- 

Myth is defined by various reasons in multiple ways. 

As Bell says-

The word ‘myth’ inhabits a twilight zone between literature, philosophy and anthropology. It means both a supremely significant foundational story and a falsehood…… The double consciousness of living a world view as a world as a world view is importantly encapsulated in modern literary mythopoeia as it unfolds over the course of the century. I emphasize the term ‘mythopoeia’, or myth making, rather than ‘myths’, since my concern is not with myth as a traditional content or as a means of literary organization. It is rather with the underlying outlook that creates myth; or, more precisely again, sees the world in mythic terms. Mythopoeia is the underlying metaphysic of much modernist literature, and a way of approaching vital problems that constantly present themselves reductively.1 

A Glossary of Literary Terms writes that

“In classical Greek “mythos” signified any story or plot whether true or invented.” In its central modern significance, however a myth is one story in a mythology- a system of hereditary stories of ancient origin which were once believed to be true by a particular cultural group and which served to explain why the world is as it is and things happens as they do, to provide a rationale for social customs and observances and to established the sanctions for the rules by which people conduct their live.”2 

Yet another Dictionary and Literary Terms notes that

“Myths are stories usually concerning super humans or gods which are related to accompany or to explain religious beliefs: they are originating far back in the culture of oral societies.”3 

For Dr. Anuradha Sharma  

“A myth is a translation of human nature to explain other -wise inexplicable phenomenon of universe, nature of life. Myth is a story that embodies a particular idea with a moral lesson. It is a symbolic imaginative record of incomprehensible reality. Myths have been invented to instruct, explain, and interpret human nature and universe to cope with the hardships and natural event.”4 

The Oxford Dictionary notes

“A kind of story or rudimentary narrative sequence, normally traditional and anonymous through which a given culture ratifies its social customs or accounts for the origin of human and natural phenomena usually in supernatural or boldly imaginative terms. The term has a wide range of meanings which can be divided roughly into ‘rationalist’ and ‘romantic’ versions: in the first a myth is a false or unreliable story or belief while in the second myth is a superior intuitive mode of cosmic understanding.”5 

For Wendy Doniger 

“(A) myth is not a lie or a false statement to be contrasted with Truth or reality or fact or history, though this usage is, perhaps, the most common meaning of myth in casual parlance today. But in the history of religions, often been used mean, ‘ truth’ what makes this ambiguity possible is that a myth is above all a story that is believed to be true and that people continue to be believe despite sometimes massive evidence that is, in fact, a lie (….) In its positive and enduring sense, what a myth is, is a story that is sacred to and shared by a group of people who find their most important meaning in it; it is a story believed to have been composed in the past about on event in the past, or more rarely, in the future, an event that continues to have meaning in the present because it is remembered; it is a story that is a part of a larger group of stories.”6 

For Alan Dundes

“Myth, as we shall see, is not symbolic but a direct expression of its subject- matter; it is not an explanation in satisfaction of a scientific interest, but a narrative resurrection of a primeval reality, told in satisfaction of deep religious wants moral cravings social sub- missions assertions even practical requirements. Myth fulfils in primitive culture an indispensable function: it expresses enhances and codifies belief; it safeguards and enforces morality it vouches for the efficiency of ritual and contains practical rules for the guidance of man.”7 

According to Segal

“Myth about social phenomena, such as customs and laws, serve to persuade primitives to accept what can be resisted.”8  

‘By ‘myth’ we do mean the words degenerate but common meaning of ‘fabrication’ or ‘fable’. ‘Myth’ in this context means ‘a vehicle of enactment for individual or community through living symbols of story or narrative.”9 

According to Plato myth 

 “It is hard to fault with them, seeing they are ancient things.”10 

In today’s definition Myth may have a doubt of futility but it can be said that they are assumed to be right by the civilization to which they fit in.  Myth may have some well-known and chronological consequences. Myths tells about the God Budha that he had taken seven steps when he was born and on every step of his the lotus opened and give message about the purity of Lotus as Brahma and Goddess Gayatri  seated on the Lotus that symbolizes knowledge. Lotus also symbolizes that it is originated from the Naval of sleeping Vishnu.  Though Lotus rises in mud but it has its aroma and quality and this symbolizes that even in adverse and evil circumstances people can live with their own purity and honesty. The Lotus has also spiritual relations. Its flourishing is related with sun and considered that as it blooms the initial energy of the Sun come to the earth and remove the darkness. From above statement it can be said that Myth is nothing but a system of communication that provide a message and to receive this message we do not need any unusual circumstance.  Myth is not merely an idea or perception; it is related with implication and work as a form.  Afterwards chronological restrictions, circumstance of utilization, and re establish society into it we allocate this form. But first it is a form. Myth works in form of speech and speech converted into dialogue or discourse. But it should be noticed that Myth is not definite by its entity of communication but focus should be on the different ways that how it absolute the message. 

 For example- 

“A tree is a tree. Yes of course. But a tree as expressed by Minou Drovet is no longer quite a tree it is a tree which is decorated adopted to a certain type of consumption laden with literary self- indulgence, revolt, images, in short with a type of social usage which is added to pure matter.”11 

Myths can be seen from different point of view. 

Dr. Swati Joshi
Gujarat 

Myth, Mythology and Epic

 Myth, Mythology and Epic

Dr. Swati Joshi 

Gujarat 

The word creation requires a structure and this structure could be in different forms just like creative writing (Prosaic or Poetic), rules and regulations and different customs. There are many continuous living systems just like administration, religious conviction, communal etiquette, philosophy, literature, art and many more that engage associations with mankind. One of those systems is Mythology. Each country and each continent has its own mythology. Myth, Mythology and Epic are interrelated and converse about every culture and tradition. Every culture has also got its mythology. There is an everlasting bond between epic and mythology.  Epic is a literary form but mythology is not. Mythology has saved the purpose of content for most of the epics in India and also in the West differently. Scholars and critics have given different interpretations about myth but all those interpretations agree upon certain common points. These points are- Myth has got in it supernatural characters with exceptional power. Myth depicts in them wars, combats and incidents of lust in them. Myth’s aim is teaching and preaching some morality to mankind. The relationship between literature and myth is also remarkable. Myth has got immortality because of its being content of literary texts and whatever myth was in the form of Oral Tradition has been documented through literary works. The same way literature is also benefited because of Myth. It has got variety of subject matter, thematic concerns and art of narration due to Myth becoming the content of literature.  This is how both Literature and Myth have proved to be complementary to each other. 


We can divide Mythology into two major divisions. 

1 Indian Mythology

2 Classical Greek Mythologies 

Classical Greek Mythologies largely deals with the place like Rome, Troy, Sparta, Athens, Thebes and some such places. It would be essential to note here that any work of mythology, includes in its supernatural characters, involving themselves and participating in the issues, conflicts and rifts related to mankind.

It is not essential that for the writing of a literary work with some kind of mythology should be there but only a work with magnitude is required. Even a small literary work can have in it the use of Mythology. It is true that whenever a literary work is written with some elements of Mythology in it, it leads to the problem of interpretations. The problem of interpretation of Myth would become even more acute when the person who interprets it is not familiar with that particular Myth. The appropriate interpretation of such a literary work would be possible only when the person who interprets is fully acquainted with that mythology. For example- If a woman tells her man not to do anything Evil and when her name is Mandodari, the person who does not know Myth would treat that woman as nearly a common character but a person who knows myth would relate it to the mythological character of Mandodari who had also requested Ravan not to live on the path of evil. This is how appropriate interpretation of a literary work with mythology in it takes place only when that person knows mythology. 

No work of mythology can ever be approached or assessed with simply logic, reason and scientific attitude. The appreciation and assessment of a work of mythology demands faith and readiness to enter into the world of make believe. The scientific approach would kill the charm of mythology.  In the contemporary times Epics and mythology works are not composed because the element of faith has died away and its place is taken by Reason. In the contemporary times man believes and follows only that which is proved scientifically. Such an approach has reduced the composition of works with mythology in them. One more responsible reason is we have now no more the time of community values where as such ground works used to be written during the Time of community values. 

There is no scope for mankind to aid new myth to the existing amount of mythology. Even if a new literary work is composed on mythology the context would be from the past. Of course, new interpretations in the modern context on existing myths are possible but investing or adding a new myth is next to impossible. 

The successive chapters are trying to interpret the selected works of Bhasa in the modern context. The attempt has been made to find out how those works sustain their relevance even in the modern times. It goes to prove them classic works as they continue to appeal us, move us as much as they had their appeal in the past.  

Dr Swati Joshi 

तेरे व्हाट्स अप डीपी को/ग़ज़ल/डॉ मनीष कुमार मिश्रा


 

बात वसूलों की/ग़ज़ल/डॉ मनीष कुमार मिश्रा


 

तुझसे भी कहकर देखेंगे/ग़ज़ल/डॉ मनीष कुमार मिश्रा


 

जो दिल में है वो बात/ग़ज़ल/डॉ मनीष कुमार मिश्रा


 

काबिल ए रश्क/ग़ज़ल/ डॉ मनीष कुमार मिश्रा


 

मीर गालिब की नस्लें/गज़लें/डॉ मनीष कुमार मिश्रा


 

राहत इंदौरी के 20 चुनिंदा शेर...

 राहत इंदौरी के 20 चुनिंदा शेर... 1.तूफ़ानों से आँख मिलाओ, सैलाबों पर वार करो मल्लाहों का चक्कर छोड़ो, तैर के दरिया पार करो 2.गुलाब, ख़्वाब, ...