Thursday, 25 June 2009

यूं.जी. सी . का तुगलकी फरमान ,जागो इंडिया जागो

मै बार -बार university grant commission के उस फैसले के ख़िलाफ़ आवाज उठा रहा हूँ ,जिसमे वे एक बार
M.PHIL/Ph.D वालो को योग्य तो कभी अयोग्य बताकर उनके साथ मजाक कर रहे है । १ जून २००९ को आए उनके
NOTIFICATION के हिसाब से अब M।PHIL STUDENTS डिग्री कॉलेज मे पढाने के योग्य नही हैं । अब कोई बताये की जो लोग मेहनत से यह डिग्री पाने के लिए काम कर रहे थे , उनका अब क्या होगा ?

इसका जवाब कौन देगा ?
नया मामला निम्नलिखित है

UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION
BAHADURSHAH ZAFAR MARG
NEW DELHI-I 10 002
UGC (MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR THE APPOINTMENT
AND CAREER ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHERS IN UNIVERSITIES AND
INSTITUTIONS AFFILIATED TO IT) (3RD AMENDMENT), REGULATION 2009.
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA
PART Ill, SECTION-4
F.1-1/2002(PS)Exemp.
1" June, 2009
NOTIFICATION
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (e) & (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 26 read
with Section 14 of University Grants Commission Act 1956 (3 of 1956), and in supersession of the
University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications required for the appointment and Career
Advancement of teachers in universities and institutions affiliated to it) (1st Amendment),
Regulation, 2002 dated 315t July, 2002 and University Grants Commission (Minimum
Qualifications required for the appointment and Career Advancement of teachers in universities
and institutions affiliated to it) (2nd Amendment), Regulation 2006 dated 14.06.2006, the
University Grants Commission hereby makes the following Regulations to amend the University
Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications required for the appointment and Career
Advancement of teachers in universities and institutions affiliated to it) Regulation, 2000, namely:-
I. Short Title, Application and Commencement:
I. These regulations may be called University Grants Commission (Minimum
Qualifications required for the appointment and Career Advancement of teachers in
universities and institutions affiliated to it) (3`d Amendment), Regulation 2009.
2. They shall apply to every university established or incorporated by or under a
Central Act, Provincial Act or a State Act, every institution including a constituent
or an affiliated college recognized by the Commission, in consultation with the
university concerned under clause (f) of Section 2 of the University Grants
Commission Act 1956, and every institution deemed to be a university under
section 3 of the said Act.
Ihev shall come into force with effect from the date of their publication in the
(la/cite of India.
In the ANNEXI:RE to the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qutltficaua»
required for the appointment and Career A , the followmgchas ptovtdedtlnttes
ancen-lent (11
and institutions affiliated to it) Regulation, 2000
Note to Regulation 1.3.3. 1.43. I.5.3 and I.6.1:
°NI;1 shall remain the compulsory requirement for appointment .^.
Lecturer even for candidates having Ph.D degree. Ilowevct the
candidates who have completed MPhil degree or have submitte
Ph.D. thesis in the concerned subject uplo 3December. 1`1`)' ;ur
exempted from appearing in the NET examination
thy'
the said Note to Regulation 13.3. 14 3. 1.5.3 and 1 .6 1 was s su
substituted bo
um QualiliLali^me
tollow6mg para. vide University Grants Commission M
equiredfor the appointment and Career Advancement of teachers in anise siue^
Regulation 200'_:
,_ NUT shall remain compulsory requirement toi appointmeu
lecturer even for candidates having PhD. Degree. ovIIvevC^
candidates who have completed M Phil. Degree by
December.1993 or have submitted Ph.D thesis to the Unive sit
ject on or be fore 31" Dc, ember 200' are exempted
the concerned sub s c,
tfr de ee, eth y shall Ihn case to lpt s ans NI
omobt
appearing in
l'h.D the
examination
in lo tile I I the
in
elholv WOV is appointmentr and (u er
CAodmvmaniscseiomnent of teachers in universities and institutions affiliated to u ^to^ ni^,o
Amendment). Regulation 2002, was turther substituted by the following
oAf the Unisersn} G rantsn Commissioin (Mimum Qualifications required I'll the
appointment and C Amendment).
Alvan) Regulation 2006^s in universities and instiuni^^ro
affiliated to it) (2 °d
NF.T shall remain compulsory requirement for aplpoinl d
ith ost raduate degree.
g '11e Lecturer even for those w p rned suhleLt in the conce
u'.
candidates having Ph.D. Degree l vel teachto
evemptcd from NF;I for PG level and lIC e
candidates having M.Phil. degree in the concerned
exempted From NFT for UL, level teaching only:
Non,
the (II)ore prorision shall he subsiil"ted hr the following paragraph
'\1,
1 SLN1' shall remain the minimum eligihilitc condition for vecruiunu'i ^-
appoinunent of lecturers in (h,ivc die+ Colleges ' Instindinn.c.
Provided, however, that candidates, who are or have been awarded Ph.D.
degree in compliance of the "University Grants Commission (minimum
standards and procedure for award of Ph.D. Degree), Regulation 2009, shall be
exempt from
the requirement of the minimum eligibility condition
of NET/SLET
for recruitment and appointment of Assistant Professor or equivalent positions in
Universities /Colleges /Institutions. "
n
I Dr. R . h auhanl
Secretary, U.G.C.
To
The Assistant Controller
Publication Division
Government of India
Ministry of Urban Development Poverty Alleviation
Civil Lines
Delhi -110054.

3 comments:

  1. My Dear M.Phil Holders .I would like to inform you.that the previous decision was taken merely on the basis of interim report (14-06-06) of Prof. Mungekar. This decision was completely against the supreme court order 1994 and National Education Policy 1986. and we can't go beyond supreme court..if any exemption has been made in previous,. is illegal..Moreover,M.Phil was introduced in the system as a foundation course for Ph.D. so think honestly how can a one year degree can replace National level test..Moreover UGC has given the exemption to all qualitative Ph.D and this decision must be appreciated.. ..we live in competitive world and Higher education needs quality on which there should be no compromise. To protect the degradation in the quality of higher education, which is one of the most important pillars towards building a civilized society, we shouldn't have given the exemption to M.Phil holders at all.Higher.Lacs of M.Phil have been submitted either illegally or with distant mode. Do you really think the ppl who can't clear a exam that is based on same subject after 6-7 attempts. are they deserve to enter in the system,we can imagine what kind of result they will produce..?.its really ridiculous... .now nothing can be happened as UGC/HRD have understand the discrepancy and are adamant to improve the quality of higher education. .I also request to all Ph.D ppl just read notification carefully...they don't need to clear NET if they publish at least one paper in journal. so please think again about it and don't waste your time ,energy and money and justify your self either clearing NET exam or finishing PhD if you really want to enter in academics..

    ReplyDelete
  2. good.but UGC must take some postive decission on mphil

    ReplyDelete
  3. Manish aapka sawal thik hai.
    UGC ke niyam ko log maan bhi nahin rahein hain
    hazoron ayogya log professor ban kar higher education ki pahle hi maar chhuke hain

    sudhir

    ReplyDelete

Share Your Views on this..